The subject of police and crime is
beyond that of patrol and arrest. It involves several
assumptions and strategies.
Two Crime Control Assumptions
1.
Police and citizens:
Society’s primary mechanism for controlling crime is the police
and the entire CJ system. This leads to isolation between the
two.
2.
Police and other
social institutions: Only the police are responsible for crime
prevention programs. The 1997 report from Univ. of Maryland
identified seven institutions that are in a crime prevention
continuum (communities, families, schools, labor markets,
places, the police, and other CJ programs).
Crime Control Strategies
provided by Sherman
1.
Proactive vs.
Reactive
2.
General vs. Specific
(routine preventive patrol vs. directed patrol)
3.
Particular crime
(gang crack down, DWI, sting operation)
4.
Specific places (hot
spots programs)
5.
Specific offenders
(the repeat offender programs)
6.
Specific victims
(mandatory arrest programs in domestic violence cases)
Measuring Effectiveness of
Crime Control Programs
This is quite complicated. It
requires meaningful definitions of what is to be measured as
well as valid and reliable data on the expected outcome. Also
debatable is the quantitative vs. qualitative measurement
issues.
Criminal Investigation (CI)
·
Most police officers
see CI as what policing is all about
·
Nationally, about
12% of personnel, largely reactive
·
CI units vary
according to the size of department and the workload
-
small dept
à
no specialized detective unit
-
medium-size
à
a separate but unspecialized unit (handle all crimes)
-
Larger dept
à
detective unit with a separate units specialized according to
type of crime (against person and property, homicide unit,
robbery unit etc.)
-
Criminalities
à
again larger dept. will have their crime scene specialists while
smaller ones will usually use state or federal
facilities.
Goals of criminal
investigations (Gerald Williams)
1.
Controlling
criminals (3 basic mechanisms are deterrence, rehabilitation,
and incapacitation)
-
Deterrence (chance
of getting caught and severely punished are greater than the
expected rewards of crime)
-
Rehabilitation or
inducement to obey the laws (through punishment, psychological
counseling, job training, or drug treatment)
-
Incapacitation (be
caught and removed from the society by incarceration
These three mechanisms do not rely
only on the police. Each mechanism has only limited ability to
control crime. However, to be successful, offenders have to
identified, caught, prosecuted, and convicted, and the police is
the one who start the CJ process.
2.
Pursuing justice
-
Police, as an arm of
government, should enhance citizens’ feelings that people who
committed crime will be punished and justice is being served
-
Civil proceedings
vs. criminal proceedings (only police can take an offender in
criminal cases to the court)
-
Police do justice by
arresting offenders and providing evidence and by treating
victims with sensitivity and showing a concern for their needs
(if chance of solving a crime is little, police should give the
victim an honest appraisal of the situation and suspend the
case; otherwise, the police are deceiving the public).
3.
Addressing problems
-
Address many
problems (from criminality and injustice); the public feel the
police should resolve (crime is just an element of a set of
troublesome circumstances)
-
Addressing problems
is like controlling criminals in that it aims to prevent future
crimes; differs from controlling criminals in that the police
may do much more than simply control crime
-
In addressing
problems, the police do not need to rely on arresting criminals
The appeal of detective work
·
crime-fighter image
and status (created by the media)
·
Opportunity for
self-initiated activities
·
less direct
supervision
·
civilian clothes
(individuality)
·
specific role
(apprehension)
·
Most important,
quality of arrests can be measured by numbers, importance of the
case, and percentage of those resulting in conviction.
The “Myth” -- capacity of
detectives to really solve crimes is greatly exaggerated (TV
cops show and movies feature detective work that is exciting and
successful; in reality it’s neither).
RAND Corporation study (1975)
A) Sources of information
·
Survey responses
from 153 of 300 jurisdictions employing more than 150 employees
·
site visits to 25
agencies
B) Major findings
1.
Differences in
investigative training, staffing, workload, and procedures
appear to have no appreciable effects on arrest or clearance
rates.
2.
Org. of
investigators cannot be significantly related to variations in
arrest or clearance rates.
3.
Almost 65% of all
serious crimes receive no more than superficial attention from
investigators (i.e., reviewing reports, documenting files, and
attempting to locate and interview victims).
4.
The single most
important determinant of whether or not a case will be solved is
the information the victim supplies to the responding officer.
5.
Patrol officers are
responsible for 60% to 90% of all arrests
6.
Patrol officers made
87% of all arrests (Reiss’s study)
7.
Most important
information leading to arrests is eyewitness testimony of
victims or witnesses (info that is typically obtained by
responding officers)
8.
In cases that are
solved, an investigator spends more time in post clearance
processing than in identifying the perpetrator.
9.
Of cases ultimately
cleared in which a perpetrator is not identified during the
initial police incident report, almost all are cleared as a
result of routine police procedures.
Solving Crimes
Clearance rates (traditional
measure of success defined by FBI)
·
Agencies clear a
crime when they have “identified the offender, have sufficient
evidence to charge him, and actually take him/her into custody,
or in exceptional instances, when some element beyond police
control precludes taking the offender into custody.”
·
Arrest as 4
dimensions: legally, behaviorally, subjectively, and officially
Problems of clearance rates:
-
Based on reported crime, but
only 37% of all crimes reported
-
Different definitions of what
connotes a clearance by different agencies
Solvability factors
·
Whether or not
police can obtain the name or description of a suspect (most
important). Clearance rates are higher for crimes of violence
(against person such as murder (70%), aggravated assault (57%),
and rape (52%)) than for property crimes (burglary (14%) and
auto theft (15%)) due to the direct contact between offender and
victim.
Physical evidence (especially
fingerprints)
·
It is not important
factor in solving crime because:
-
difficult to obtain
a useful print
-
the likelihood that
the offender has prints on file (prior arrest)
-
In the past
searching the files to match the prints is time-consuming, now
is faster by using the Automated Fingerprint Identification
System (AFIS)
Managing investigations
·
RAND study (1975)
commented that “most investigators received very little
supervision on the performance of their jobs.”
Improving investigation
management
1.
more efficient case
screening (evidence rather than hunches and intuition)
2.
closer working
relationships between patrol and detectives and other officials
3.
quality of PCR (COP
idea) (a victim recon tact program in Houston, TX)
4.
system approach (VICAP;
NCAVC)
Solving Crimes: The
Investigation of Burglary and robbery by John Eck
(1983)—(sponsored by PERF, Police Executive Research Forum)
·
Early research
findings (1975 Rand Corporation study is the best known)
-
did not examine how
investigations should be conducted
-
criticized
investigative operations as wasteful and mismanaged
-
few cases receive
more than superficial attention
-
declared that the
success of solving crime depend upon the information the
responding officers at the crime scene received from the victim
·
Methodology
-
PERF’s two-year
study of criminal investigations in three jurisdictions, three
counties in Georgia, Florida, and Kansas
-
analysis involved
more than 320 robberies and 3,360 burglaries
-
data came from crime
reports; other official records; information from patrol
officers and detectives regarding the actions they took, the
amount of time these actions consumed, and the information
obtained as a result
·
Findings
·
short investigation,
with changing focus
-
most burglary and
robbery cases are investigated for no more than four hours from
preliminary to follow-up investigations (about 3 to 11 days
between the report of the crime and the suspension of the case
-
in most cases,
responding patrol officers did:
-
check the crime
scene
-
interviewing the
witnesses
-
collecting physical
evidence
-
canvassing
neighborhood for other possible witnesses
-
in screening
process, initial investigations and the early stage of follow-up
investigations focus on the crime victim and information
obtained from the crime (which are outside the control of the
police department)
-
Victims are relied
too much upon for crime information, but in any given case
information from the victims are the one that was less likely to
lead to arresting the suspect. (Interviewing the victims by the
detective has no effect on arresting criminals).
-
In contrast, four
other sources (i.e., witnesses, informants, other members of the
department, and department records) are consulted less often.
But when they are consulted, they are more likely to yield
fruitful information.
·
Patrol officers and
detectives contribute equally to solving cases
-
even when the
preliminary investigation contains no suspect information,
detectives can get the suspect’s name in about 14% of such cases
and make an arrest about 8% of those cases
Improving information
collection (based on Eck’s study’s findings)
·
Preliminary
investigation
-
collect more
physical evidence (have policies defining when technicians
should or should not be sent)
-
devoted more effort
to canvassing neighborhoods for witnesses
-
use department
records more extensively (design record systems that can be used
through radio and telephone)
-
make greater use of
informants (provide training and encouragement to help patrol
officers develop informants)
·
Follow-up
investigation
-
use more agency
records
-
make more extensive
use of informants (and how to handle informants)
Online resource
(web links for more information)
 |